PDA

View Full Version : TLM

Andrew_Carr
11-15-2006, 12:39 PM
Hey Tal and Mori, would you be interested in reforming TLM once the new content patch is released? I'd like to be able to get a consistent 3 man group running.
Talaryn
11-15-2006, 02:00 PM
TLM BITCH!!!




Our group comp may just be ass though, which is my main concern. But hey I'm down if we won't continually lose due to it!
Sylveslexi
11-15-2006, 04:20 PM
You need healers.

Specifically, a paladin or two.

Or three.
Talaryn
11-15-2006, 04:33 PM
You need healers.

Specifically, a paladin or two.

Or three.


REALLY!!??!?!??!?!!!!!?!?!!?!?!?!?!??!?!!?!?!?!?!? !?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!?

(duh Warriors ARE Paladins -- Crusader Strike amirite!?)
Gravity
11-15-2006, 07:26 PM
Pally, Warrior, Warlock!
Sylveslexi
11-15-2006, 10:10 PM
I want to see Warlock Warlock Warlock.


It'd own in .... 5v5.
Andrew_Carr
11-16-2006, 08:22 AM
Warlocks really aren't that bad, because most of them don't pull seduce+fear cheese.
Sylveslexi
11-16-2006, 09:24 AM
In TBC, they don't even need to.

rofl felguard.
Celnathor
11-16-2006, 06:04 PM
Warlocks really aren't that bad, because most of them don't pull seduce+fear cheese.


So a class isn't overpowered, because most of them don't effectively utilize the most powerful aspects of their class? ::)
Andrew_Carr
11-17-2006, 01:08 AM
Warlocks really aren't that bad, because most of them don't pull seduce+fear cheese.


So a class isn't overpowered, because most of them don't effectively utilize the most powerful aspects of their class? ::)


"Warlocks really aren't that bad, because most of them don't pull seduce+fear cheese."

Where'd I mention anything about the class not being overpowered?\

It SHOULD be much worse, but since some locks seem to despise using that technique, or because their pets happen to be so specialized they're not worth much in random encounters, warlocks, in general, aren't bad.